CBRS IPO 估值争议 ⟪LINK24⟫
情绪博弈重于基本面,前期投资者吹捧 $250B 估值但订单高度集中
- 营收与利润脱节: 2028 营收预期 $7B,但营业利润率仍为负,当前盈利靠非现金收益[1]Maverick · 05-11"… gain, not real earnings. It should be easy to improve from negative 30% but what to model? With a 50% gross margin it's hard to mod…"
- 估值锚点: $120 中轴对应 50x forward PE,若定价 $160 则对应 32x CY28 PE[2]Mei · 05-11"If priced at $160, it would be around 32X CY28 PE"
- 订单水分: 积压订单 80% 是 OpenAI 期权,缺乏其他实质合同支撑[3]RNB · 05-11"…...which is the pump...seriously where are those contracts? 80pct of the backlog is an openAI option"
- 架构与产能质疑: LPU/WSE 在微小上下文窗口模型之外的用例存疑,且市场质疑其是否在 TSMC 锁定了足够的 N5 产能以支撑 1500 台 CS-3 系统的销售目标[4]Arun Dhar · 05-11"…en back to me yet on what's the use-case for LPUs (or WSEs) outside of small / niche models with tiny context windows?"[5]Arun Dhar · 05-11"…quiv. They actually marketing they can sell that? Have they secured enough N5 capacity at TSMC?"
- 流通盘与炒作: 流通盘约 $5.5B,锁定期内纯交易情绪,需警惕 Vera Rubin 发布会带来的腰斩风险[6]ROL Capital Management · 05-11"…es day 1 and maybe 2 (tax liability related). So all in say 5.5bn at 150/share. Then you can add whatever upside you think it has to the 5…"[1]Maverick · 05-11"…ally as we get closer to Vera Rubin adoption. CBRS could be cut in half with Jensen press conference."
INTC 2028 盈利分布 ⟪LINK25⟫
核心逻辑从点预测转向分布上限,代工与主权背书打开想象空间
- 卖方 vs 买方预期: 卖方最高看 $3,买方模型跑出 $3.31[7]Terminal Junkie · 05-11"not a bull, but eps'28 for me is at $3.31"
- 代工贡献门槛: 若要 EPS 突破 $3,IFS 需贡献 $1+;按华尔街 $20-21B 营收预期只能贡献 $0.5[8]Arun Dhar · 05-11"At $20-21b where street is, you're not going to get past $0.5 eps. Round figure. I don't think the ultimate earnings power is…"
- 看多逻辑: 算力需求与 CoWoS 产能缺口扩大 + 18A/14A + 主权背书 = 巨大的盈利潜力分布[8]Arun Dhar · 05-11"…that there is a difference and it grows every year. Now add sovereign backstop and 18A+14A. I think the ground is so fertile for INTC. IFS + CPU renai…"
存储巨头估值框架重估 ⟪LINK26⟫
若 AI CapEx 绝对增长与 LTA 绑定兑现,传统前瞻 P/E 或失效
- 两大结构性假设: Hyperscaler AI CapEx 在未来 7-10 年维持绝对增长 + 存储行业成功转向不可取消的 LTA (take-or-pay)[9]MikeyBs · 05-10"… for a moment two structural shifts—1) Hyperscaler AI CapEx sustains absolute growth (not rate of growth) over the next 7-10 yrs (as ex-AWS, I b…"[9]MikeyBs · 05-10"…his one), and 2) the memory industry successfully pivots to binding, non-cancelable LTAs (take-or-pay)—what’s the appropriate mid-cycle multiple? Wi…"
- 估值锚点转移: 在结构性毛利扩张下,市场探讨是否应摒弃 forward P/E,转向 EV/EBITDA 或结构性更高的 P/B[9]MikeyBs · 05-10"…ll relevant here? Should we be anchoring to something else (EV/EBITDA or a structurally higher P/B instead)?"