以下部分引用 AI 总结,现阶段 AI 仍然有幻觉。请以内容的原文为准。
数据新鲜度群聊 07-14 ✓卖方 07-14 ✓Wrap 断档15天 ✕News 07-15 ✓X 断档12天 ✕页面生成 07-15
exit tax
5 atoms · 跨 2 天 · 首见 2026-06-20 · 最近 2026-06-21
三色: 🟦 fact 0 · 🟥 take 5 · stance ▲0/▼0/◆0
来源: X 5
时态: fresh:5
标签: 好思考:3 · 好观点:2 · 好问题:1
叙事 (narrative) (5)
- 2026-06-20 · implementation challenge
Exit taxes make sense in theory, but how would they work for private companies that don’t have a real market for their shares to raise the cash to pay the bill? Selling to fund the tax just triggers more taxable gains, which then requires more selling – a loop that’s hard to escape.
tags: 好思考·好问题 · → daily
- 2026-06-21 · enforcement challenge
Deferring taxes on people leaving your jurisdiction is never going to work for most countries. Only the US could hunt down rich tax evaders at the other end of the world decades after the fact. So you have to take your cut when they leave.
tags: 好思考 · → daily
- 2026-06-20 · enforcement suggestion
A government lien on the shares might be cleaner in theory, but once the founder changes jurisdiction it becomes incredibly hard to enforce in practice.
tags: 好思考 · → daily
- 2026-06-20 · comparison
Lots of countries do not have exit taxes. It doesn’t have to be either or you could just have an adult discussion about whether the amount that is kept as tax is fair or not
tags: 好观点 · → daily
- 2026-06-20 · comparison
UK, Switzerland, Belgium, NZ. Adult convo means talk about whether the level is fair. These percentages are policy decisions and the voting public has a right to talk about it without people telling them to shut up.
tags: 好观点 · → daily
时间轴 (近 20)
- 2026-06-21 ·
narrative · enforcement challenge · → daily
- 2026-06-20 ·
narrative · implementation challenge · → daily
- 2026-06-20 ·
narrative · enforcement suggestion · → daily
- 2026-06-20 ·
narrative · comparison · → daily
- 2026-06-20 ·
narrative · comparison · → daily
← 实体目录 · 系统日志