超大厂 CapEx 上修 ⟪LINK30⟫
FY27 预期大幅上调,万亿级别投资成新共识 财报后华尔街全面上调四大厂资本支出预期
- 预期对比: 财报前买方预期 AMZN $200B, GOOGL $240B, MSFT $190B, META $175B;财报后 JPM 预期分别上修至约 $300B, $275B, $240B, $200B[4]Ian · 05-04"…r Mark Schilsky at JPM, estimates are AMZN at approximately $300B, GOOGL at $275B, MSFT at $240B, and META at approximately $…"。
- 万亿规模: 四大厂合计 CapEx 突破 $1T 大关正迅速成为市场新共识[4]Ian · 05-04"…rce, but the bottom line is that a massive ramp-up past the $1T mark may be fast becoming the new consensus."。
软件被替代的争论 ⟪LINK31⟫
AI 抽走软件增量资金的担忧加剧 争论焦点在于企业购买 token 是否会缓慢反噬 SaaS 预算
- NOW 的困境: NOW CEO 呼吁转向按量计费,而 Atlassian 称未见席位压缩[5]Randy Marsh · 05-04"…sees no seat compression whatsoever and that they had their best Jira seat revs ever. Is this a product issue?"。群友认为 NOW 处于“否认阶段”[6]Arun Dhar · 05-04"It's a “which stage of denial are you at?” Issue"。
- AI 实验室的威胁: 多头指出 OpenAI ARR 达 $25B vs NOW $14B,Anthropic 单季 ARR 增量是 NOW 全年的 1.5 倍[7]Mo W · 05-04"Uhh OAI at $25bn ARR vs. NOW $14bn... Anthropic did 1.5x NOW's entire ARR 1qtr sequentially",认为增量资金被 AI 抽走。
- 反驳逻辑: 也有观点认为,购买 AI token 的正是这些软件企业,AI 暂时无法完全替代企业级中间层,更多是“千刀万剐”式的缓慢流血[8]Randy Marsh · 05-04"death by thousand cuts vs frontal assault"。
PLTR 财报电话会灾难 ⟪LINK32⟫
电话会频发技术故障 + 话术空洞,未能平息美国商业增速放缓担忧 市场对 'AI 实验室抢份额' 叙事存在分歧
- 电话会灾难: 麦克风多次断线,准备好的发言被指像 AI 生成的废话 (slop)[9]Mo W · 05-04"The call was a disaster (mic kept dropping, I think they went through 3?), prepared remarks sounded li…"。
- 商业增速放缓: 业绩超预期但未达到多头高要求,且未能有效解释美国商业业务减速及反驳 AI 实验室入侵的担忧[10]Mo W · 05-04"…light vs bull case and didn't address the real concerns of (US commercial decel). The defensiveness about political dynamics didn't help ei…"。
- 份额流失争论: 部分观点认为 AI 实验室抢份额的说法是懒惰的做空叙事,公司实际上已上调全年指引[11]Ummera · 05-04"The lazy AI Lab share loss narrative selling is lame though"。
Uber 的 AI 账单 ⟪LINK33⟫
Uber 3-4个月烧完全年 AI 预算,开始权衡招聘 生产力提升带来预算结构的改变
- 预算超支: Uber CEO 透露,公司在 3-4 个月内就耗尽了全年的 AI token 和基础设施预算[12]Akh · 05-04"…token and infrastructure budget for the whole year in about three to four months. And it was a big thing when that happened, but it happened…"。
- 招聘权衡: 由于基础设施支出超支,公司将在人员招聘上变得不那么激进,这是预算管理方式的根本性转变[12]Akh · 05-04"…tivity that’s being added to our engineers – we’re going to hire less aggressively, so to speak. That is a live trade-off. How far it’s going …"。