AI 落地定性 ⟪LINK28⟫
AI 落地定性分歧:多头视其为新一代 RPA,空头认为仅是高级外包 Ken Griffin 态度反转成多头关键论据
- 空方观点: AI 本质 = glorified Accenture,企业用新头衔包装传统外包工作。当前处于蜜月期,长期在资金、电力、物理层面不可持续[1]Randy Marsh · 05-16"That ai is basically a glorified accenture" [2]Randy Marsh · 05-16"In many ways. Money/economics is only one part of the issue. Power is another phase then there’s land & water. Then …"。
- 多方反驳: AI = 企业生产力下一代 RPA/BPA。过去自动化瓶颈 = 确定性限制(难预见边缘情况) → 新 AI/Agentic workflows = 实现动态决策[3]Mo W · 05-16"Ah. No I don't think AI is the new Accenture. It’s clear that AI is the new rpa/bpa for enterprise productivity + itsm +…"。
- Ken Griffin 反转: Citadel 的 Ken Griffin 态度 180 度大转弯:AI 工具链生产力在过去几个月发生阶跃变化,原本需数周的金融高技能工作现由 AI agent 在几小时内完成[4]Akh · 05-16"A big pivot from Citadel's Ken Griffin on AI: “Number one is, in the last few months, there has been a step change in th…"。
- FDE 角色定位: 技术从业者反驳:FDE(Forward Deployed Engineer)= 90/00 年代的现场 IT 顾问,专注特定技术(如 Claude)以加快企业上市时间,不否定技术本身价值[5]overunderfit · 05-16"Seems like a clickbait title? FDE’s are just glorified on-site IT consultants from the 90s/2000s. They are experts at th…"。